Why Non-Tech Companies Need More Time to Lease Office Space in San Francisco

At roughly 86 million square feet, the San Francisco office market is not particularly large. When you break it down by submarkets, building class, or premium view space, it becomes even smaller. With approximately 8 million square feet of active demand, much of it concentrated in the best submarkets and best buildings, the leasing environment can become challenging for companies that want to make thoughtful, well-informed decisions.

Technology companies, especially AI firms, represent the largest share of that demand. But San Francisco is home to many companies outside the tech sector. These businesses must often operate in a market shaped by the behavior of fast-moving technology tenants.

That dynamic creates friction.

Tech companies frequently move faster and are often willing to pay more to secure the right space. Historically they have absorbed space quickly and sometimes with less sensitivity to deal terms. It is not that terms do not matter to them. Their priorities are simply different. In the technology economy, speed often determines the winners. Companies race to scale and investors continue to provide enormous capital to the firms they believe will get there first.

For more mature, non-tech businesses, this can make the leasing process difficult. Space they carefully evaluate can disappear overnight when a technology company decides to move faster or pay more.

So what should these companies do?

Allow more time for the leasing process.

Time creates flexibility. It allows companies to evaluate options thoroughly, negotiate with multiple landlords, and pivot when opportunities disappear. When tenants lose space to faster-moving competitors, the real problem is rarely the leasing strategy. The problem is usually a lack of time to recover and pursue alternatives.

Starting early does not mean starting blindly. Begin too early and the process can lose momentum. But if companies are going to make a mistake on timing, it is far better to err on the side of starting too early rather than too late.

Because in San Francisco’s office market, time is not just part of the leasing process.

It is often the single greatest source of negotiating leverage an occupier has.

Previous
Previous

Landlord as Bank: The Hidden Cost of "Convenient" TI Financing

Next
Next

Block’s Layoffs: Validating the Citrini Thesis, or Solving for Gross Mismanagement?